Guinea-Bissau vs Hungary: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Hungary
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1.86 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Hungary, a difference of 1.86 DB17-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Hungary ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 80th and Hungary ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Guinea-Bissau or Hungary?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1.86 DB17-20 methodology against 0 DB17-20 methodology in Hungary as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Guinea-Bissau and Hungary?
- 1.86 DB17-20 methodology, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Hungary?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Hungary rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 80th and Hungary ranks 83rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.