Congo vs Malaysia: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Congo
- Malaysia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 27.71 DB17-20 methodology against 25.64 DB17-20 methodology in Malaysia, a difference of 2.07 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malaysia ahead.
Congo ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Congo or Malaysia?
- Congo, at 27.71 DB17-20 methodology against 25.64 DB17-20 methodology in Malaysia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Congo and Malaysia?
- 2.07 DB17-20 methodology, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo and Malaysia rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Congo ranks 27th and Malaysia ranks 28th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.