Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Poland: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 18.14 DB17-20 methodology against 16.71 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 1.43 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 46th and Poland ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Poland?
- Poland, at 18.14 DB17-20 methodology against 16.71 DB17-20 methodology in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Poland?
- 1.43 DB17-20 methodology, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Poland rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 46th and Poland ranks 43rd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.