Democratic Republic of Congo vs Nepal: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 17.86 DB17-20 methodology against 16.71 DB17-20 methodology in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 1.15 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 46th and Nepal ranks 44th of 181 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Democratic Republic of Congo or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 17.86 DB17-20 methodology against 16.71 DB17-20 methodology in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal?
- 1.15 DB17-20 methodology, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 46th and Nepal ranks 44th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.