Central African Republic vs Malaysia: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Central African Republic
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 25.64 DB17-20 methodology against 25.43 DB17-20 methodology in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.21 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Central African Republic or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 25.64 DB17-20 methodology against 25.43 DB17-20 methodology in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Central African Republic and Malaysia?
- 0.21 DB17-20 methodology, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Malaysia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Malaysia rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Central African Republic ranks 29th and Malaysia ranks 28th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.