Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Egypt: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Egypt
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 16.71 DB17-20 methodology against 14.86 DB17-20 methodology in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.85 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Egypt's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th and Egypt ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Egypt?
- Egypt, at 16.71 DB17-20 methodology against 14.86 DB17-20 methodology in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Egypt?
- 1.85 DB17-20 methodology, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Egypt?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Egypt rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th and Egypt ranks 46th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.