Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Canada: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Bosnia and Herzegovina
14.86 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Canada
14.86 DB17-20 methodology
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
48th
Canada rank
48th
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Canada
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 14.86 DB17-20 methodology against 14.86 DB17-20 methodology in Canada, a difference of 0 DB17-20 methodology.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th and Canada ranks 48th of 181 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Canada?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 14.86 DB17-20 methodology against 14.86 DB17-20 methodology in Canada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Canada?
- 0 DB17-20 methodology, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Canada?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Canada rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 48th and Canada ranks 48th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.