Afghanistan vs Mauritania: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Afghanistan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 35.86 DB17-20 methodology against 33.14 DB17-20 methodology in Afghanistan, a difference of 2.72 DB17-20 methodology.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 17th and Mauritania ranks 14th of 181 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Afghanistan or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 35.86 DB17-20 methodology against 33.14 DB17-20 methodology in Afghanistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Afghanistan and Mauritania?
- 2.72 DB17-20 methodology, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and Mauritania rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Afghanistan ranks 17th and Mauritania ranks 14th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) measures the time to complete a review by the tax authority including a formal tax audit if in 25% or more of cases, a company that voluntarily reports an error in its corporate income tax return and an underpayment of the tax due would be selected for additional review. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.