Tanzania, United Republic of vs United States of America: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Tanzania, United Republic of
100
in 2019
United States of America
100
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
1st
United States of America rank
1st
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- United States of America
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 100 against 100 in United States of America, a difference of 0.
Across all 5 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 182 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Tanzania, United Republic of or United States of America?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 100 against 100 in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Tanzania, United Republic of and United States of America?
- 0, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and United States of America?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and United States of America rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to complete with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.