Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Switzerland: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
70.98
in 2019
Switzerland
72.32
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
119th
Switzerland rank
118th
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 72.32 against 70.98 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 1.34.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 182 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 72.32 against 70.98 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Switzerland?
- 1.34, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Switzerland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Switzerland rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th and Switzerland ranks 118th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to complete with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.