Saint Lucia vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Saint Lucia
72.77
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
70.98
in 2019
Saint Lucia rank
117th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
119th
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Saint Lucia
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 72.77 against 70.98 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 1.79.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 117th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th of 182 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Saint Lucia or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Lucia, at 72.77 against 70.98 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 1.79, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Saint Lucia and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Saint Lucia ranks 117th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 119th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to complete with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.