Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction
Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 53.57 against 47.77 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 5.8.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Congo, Democratic Republic of the's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 135th of 182 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 53.57 against 47.77 in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 5.8, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for paying taxes: time to complete a corporate income tax correction?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 133rd and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 135th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time to complete a corporate income tax correction (weeks) (DB17-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to complete with a corporate income tax correction benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB17-20 studies.