Yemen, Rep. vs Zimbabwe: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Yemen, Rep.
69.24
in 2019
Zimbabwe
70.17
in 2019
Yemen, Rep. rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
126th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Yemen, Rep.
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 70.17 against 69.24 in Yemen, Rep., a difference of 0.93.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Yemen, Rep. ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 188 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Yemen, Rep. Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 69.24 70.05 0.8037 Zimbabwe
2010s 69.24 70.17 0.9273 Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Yemen, Rep. or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 70.17 against 69.24 in Yemen, Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Yemen, Rep. and Zimbabwe?
0.93, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Yemen, Rep. and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Yemen, Rep. and Zimbabwe rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Yemen, Rep. ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 126th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.