United Arab Emirates vs Zambia: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
United Arab Emirates
83.15
in 2019
Zambia
83.15
in 2019
United Arab Emirates rank
61st
Zambia rank
61st
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Zambia
How they compare
United Arab Emirates currently reports 83.15 against 83.15 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 61st of 190 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100 | 79.29 | 20.71 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 98.32 | 80.38 | 17.94 | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, United Arab Emirates or Zambia?
- United Arab Emirates, at 83.15 against 83.15 in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between United Arab Emirates and Zambia?
- 0, with United Arab Emirates ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Zambia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Zambia rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 61st and Zambia ranks 61st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.