Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 76.2 against 75.58 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.62.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saint Kitts and Nevis averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.53 | 80.99 | 0.541 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 76.94 | 78.5 | 1.56 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 76.2 against 75.58 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.62, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.