South Sudan, Republic of vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
South Sudan, Republic of
75.12
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
75.58
in 2019
South Sudan, Republic of rank
104th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
102nd
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- South Sudan, Republic of
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 75.58 against 75.12 in South Sudan, Republic of, a difference of 0.46.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
South Sudan, Republic of ranks 104th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, South Sudan, Republic of or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Tanzania, United Republic of, at 75.58 against 75.12 in South Sudan, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between South Sudan, Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.46, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan, Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do South Sudan, Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- South Sudan, Republic of ranks 104th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 102nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.