South Africa vs Trinidad and Tobago: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
South Africa
75.12
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
75.12
in 2019
South Africa rank
105th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
105th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 75.12 against 75.12 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
South Africa ranks 105th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 105th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.37 | 75.12 | 11.75 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 76.38 | 75.12 | 1.27 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, South Africa or Trinidad and Tobago?
- South Africa, at 75.12 against 75.12 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- South Africa ranks 105th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 105th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.