Slovenia vs East Timor: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Slovenia
71.56
in 2019
East Timor
71.41
in 2019
Slovenia rank
120th
East Timor rank
121st

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Slovenia
  • East Timor
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 71.56 against 71.41 in East Timor, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Slovenia ahead.

Slovenia ranks 120th and East Timor ranks 121st of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Slovenia averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 70.97 21.76 49.21 Slovenia
2010s 71.56 82.26 10.7 East Timor

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Slovenia or East Timor?
Slovenia, at 71.56 against 71.41 in East Timor as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Slovenia and East Timor?
0.15, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and East Timor?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Slovenia and East Timor rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Slovenia ranks 120th and East Timor ranks 121st of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.