Seychelles vs Solomon Islands: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Seychelles
94.44
in 2019
Solomon Islands
95.21
in 2019
Seychelles rank
17th
Solomon Islands rank
15th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Seychelles
  • Solomon Islands
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Solomon Islands currently reports 95.21 against 94.44 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.77.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.

Seychelles ranks 17th and Solomon Islands ranks 15th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Seychelles averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Seychelles Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 95.83 95.21 0.6182 Seychelles
2010s 94.95 95.21 0.2628 Solomon Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Seychelles or Solomon Islands?
Solomon Islands, at 95.21 against 94.44 in Seychelles as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Seychelles and Solomon Islands?
0.77, with Solomon Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and Solomon Islands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Seychelles and Solomon Islands rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Seychelles ranks 17th and Solomon Islands ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.