Saudi Arabia vs Zambia: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Saudi Arabia
84.08
in 2019
Zambia
83.15
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
56th
Zambia rank
59th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Saudi Arabia
  • Zambia
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 84.08 against 83.15 in Zambia, a difference of 0.93.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Saudi Arabia has been ahead every year.

Saudi Arabia ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 59th of 188 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saudi Arabia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 95.67 79.29 16.38 Saudi Arabia
2010s 96.24 80.38 15.87 Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Saudi Arabia or Zambia?
Saudi Arabia, at 84.08 against 83.15 in Zambia as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
0.93, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Zambia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Saudi Arabia and Zambia rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Saudi Arabia ranks 56th and Zambia ranks 59th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.