Russian Federation vs Uruguay: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Russian Federation
83
in 2019
Uruguay
82.38
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
61st
Uruguay rank
64th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Uruguay
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 83 against 82.38 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.62.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 64th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Uruguay in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Uruguay Difference Ahead
2000s 42.29 58.61 16.32 Uruguay
2010s 77.23 66.34 10.9 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Russian Federation or Uruguay?
Russian Federation, at 83 against 82.38 in Uruguay as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Russian Federation and Uruguay?
0.62, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Uruguay?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Russian Federation and Uruguay rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Russian Federation ranks 61st and Uruguay ranks 64th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.