Philippines vs Palestine, State of: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Philippines
81.14
in 2019
Palestine, State of
80.68
in 2019
Philippines rank
75th
Palestine, State of rank
77th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Philippines
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 81.14 against 80.68 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Philippines ranks 75th and Palestine, State of ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 77.43 | 81.3 | 3.86 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 78.52 | 81.76 | 3.24 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Philippines or Palestine, State of?
- Philippines, at 81.14 against 80.68 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Philippines and Palestine, State of?
- 0.46, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Palestine, State of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Palestine, State of rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Philippines ranks 75th and Palestine, State of ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.