Panama vs Sao Tome and Principe: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Panama
44.51
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
42.04
in 2019
Panama rank
174th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
177th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Panama
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Panama currently reports 44.51 against 42.04 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 2.47.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Panama ranks 174th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.25 | 42.04 | 13.79 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 41.17 | 42.04 | 0.8656 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Panama or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Panama, at 44.51 against 42.04 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Panama and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 2.47, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Panama and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Panama ranks 174th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.