Netherlands vs North Macedonia: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Netherlands
89.18
in 2019
North Macedonia
89.18
in 2019
Netherlands rank
29th
North Macedonia rank
29th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Netherlands
  • North Macedonia
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 89.18 against 89.18 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Netherlands ranks 29th and North Macedonia ranks 29th of 188 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 75.92 80.49 4.57 North Macedonia
2010s 88.79 89.18 0.3864 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Netherlands or North Macedonia?
Netherlands, at 89.18 against 89.18 in North Macedonia as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Netherlands and North Macedonia?
0, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and North Macedonia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Netherlands and North Macedonia rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Netherlands ranks 29th and North Macedonia ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.