Mozambique vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Mozambique
76.66
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
76.2
in 2019
Mozambique rank
96th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
99th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Mozambique
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 76.66 against 76.2 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.46.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Mozambique ranks 96th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th of 190 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 72.02 | 81.53 | 9.51 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 74.08 | 76.94 | 2.86 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Mozambique or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mozambique, at 76.66 against 76.2 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Mozambique and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.46, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Mozambique ranks 96th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 99th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.