Mozambique vs Nicaragua: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Mozambique
76.66
in 2019
Nicaragua
76.51
in 2019
Mozambique rank
94th
Nicaragua rank
96th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Mozambique
  • Nicaragua
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 76.66 against 76.51 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 94th and Nicaragua ranks 96th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Nicaragua Difference Ahead
2000s 72.02 70.48 1.55 Mozambique
2010s 74.08 75.72 1.64 Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Mozambique or Nicaragua?
Mozambique, at 76.66 against 76.51 in Nicaragua as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Mozambique and Nicaragua?
0.15, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Nicaragua?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Mozambique and Nicaragua rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Mozambique ranks 94th and Nicaragua ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.