Montenegro vs Pakistan: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Montenegro
61.21
in 2019
Pakistan
63.83
in 2019
Montenegro rank
150th
Pakistan rank
147th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Montenegro
  • Pakistan
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 63.83 against 61.21 in Montenegro, a difference of 2.62.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Pakistan ahead.

Montenegro ranks 150th and Pakistan ranks 147th of 188 countries.

Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Pakistan Difference Ahead
2000s 50.08 60.12 10.05 Pakistan
2010s 57.84 60.56 2.73 Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Montenegro or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 63.83 against 61.21 in Montenegro as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Montenegro and Pakistan?
2.62, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Pakistan?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
How do Montenegro and Pakistan rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Montenegro ranks 150th and Pakistan ranks 147th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.