Micronesia (country) vs Sweden: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Micronesia (country)
87.79
in 2019
Sweden
88.72
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
36th
Sweden rank
34th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Sweden
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 88.72 against 87.79 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.93.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 34th of 188 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 87.79 88.72 0.9274 Sweden
2010s 87.79 88.72 0.9274 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Micronesia (country) or Sweden?
Sweden, at 88.72 against 87.79 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Micronesia (country) and Sweden?
0.93, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Sweden?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Micronesia (country) and Sweden rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 36th and Sweden ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.