Micronesia (country) vs Sri Lanka: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Micronesia (country)
87.79
in 2019
Sri Lanka
87.64
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
36th
Sri Lanka rank
38th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Micronesia (country)
  • Sri Lanka
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 87.79 against 87.64 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.15.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.

Micronesia (country) ranks 36th and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 188 countries.

Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia (country) Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2000s 87.79 67.08 20.71 Micronesia (country)
2010s 87.79 77.69 10.1 Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Micronesia (country) or Sri Lanka?
Micronesia (country), at 87.79 against 87.64 in Sri Lanka as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Micronesia (country) and Sri Lanka?
0.15, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Sri Lanka?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Micronesia (country) and Sri Lanka rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Micronesia (country) ranks 36th and Sri Lanka ranks 38th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.