Mauritius vs New Zealand: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Mauritius
85.94
in 2019
New Zealand
85.94
in 2019
Mauritius rank
49th
New Zealand rank
49th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- New Zealand
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 85.94 against 85.94 in New Zealand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 49th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.69 | 80.99 | 1.7 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 83.85 | 84.02 | 0.17 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Mauritius or New Zealand?
- Mauritius, at 85.94 against 85.94 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 0, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and New Zealand?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and New Zealand rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 49th and New Zealand ranks 49th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.