Kuwait vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Kuwait
92.43
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
90.88
in 2019
Kuwait rank
23rd
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
26th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Kuwait
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 92.43 against 90.88 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 1.55.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Kuwait ranks 23rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 26th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 1 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.43 | 93.49 | 1.07 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
| 2010s | 92.43 | 90.74 | 1.68 | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Kuwait or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Kuwait, at 92.43 against 90.88 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Kuwait and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 1.55, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kuwait and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Kuwait ranks 23rd and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 26th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.