South Korea vs United States: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

South Korea
80.68
in 2019
United States
80.53
in 2019
South Korea rank
74th
United States rank
77th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • United States
020406080200520122019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 80.68 against 80.53 in United States, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 74th and United States ranks 77th of 188 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea United States Difference Ahead
2000s 65.22 65.87 0.6492 United States
2010s 76.94 80.15 3.21 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, South Korea or United States?
South Korea, at 80.68 against 80.53 in United States as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between South Korea and United States?
0.15, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and United States?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do South Korea and United States rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
South Korea ranks 74th and United States ranks 77th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.