South Korea vs Philippines: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

South Korea
80.68
in 2019
Philippines
81.14
in 2019
South Korea rank
74th
Philippines rank
72nd

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • South Korea
  • Philippines
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 81.14 against 80.68 in South Korea, a difference of 0.46.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.

South Korea ranks 74th and Philippines ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 65.22 77.43 12.21 Philippines
2010s 76.94 78.52 1.58 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, South Korea or Philippines?
Philippines, at 81.14 against 80.68 in South Korea as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between South Korea and Philippines?
0.46, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Philippines?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Philippines rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
South Korea ranks 74th and Philippines ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.