Kazakhstan, Republic of vs Slovak Republic: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Kazakhstan, Republic of
78.83
in 2019
Slovak Republic
77.9
in 2019
Kazakhstan, Republic of rank
89th
Slovak Republic rank
92nd
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan, Republic of
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Kazakhstan, Republic of currently reports 78.83 against 77.9 in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.93.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 89th and Slovak Republic ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
Kazakhstan, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan, Republic of | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.23 | 59.44 | 7.79 | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
| 2010s | 78.59 | 75.66 | 2.94 | Kazakhstan, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Kazakhstan, Republic of or Slovak Republic?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of, at 78.83 against 77.9 in Slovak Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Kazakhstan, Republic of and Slovak Republic?
- 0.93, with Kazakhstan, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan, Republic of and Slovak Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Kazakhstan, Republic of and Slovak Republic rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Kazakhstan, Republic of ranks 89th and Slovak Republic ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.