Indonesia vs Kazakhstan: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Indonesia
78.05
in 2019
Kazakhstan
78.83
in 2019
Indonesia rank
89th
Kazakhstan rank
87th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Indonesia
  • Kazakhstan
20406080200520122019

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 78.83 against 78.05 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.78.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Indonesia ranks 89th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 188 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Indonesia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 47.79 67.23 19.44 Kazakhstan
2010s 71.04 78.59 7.56 Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Indonesia or Kazakhstan?
Kazakhstan, at 78.83 against 78.05 in Indonesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
0.78, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Kazakhstan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Indonesia and Kazakhstan rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Indonesia ranks 89th and Kazakhstan ranks 87th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.