Georgia vs Iran, Islamic Rep.: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Georgia
74.19
in 2019
Iran, Islamic Rep.
74.19
in 2019
Georgia rank
105th
Iran, Islamic Rep. rank
105th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Georgia
  • Iran, Islamic Rep.
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 74.19 against 74.19 in Iran, Islamic Rep., a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Iran, Islamic Rep. ahead.

Georgia ranks 105th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 105th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Rep. in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Iran, Islamic Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 45.87 54.4 8.53 Iran, Islamic Rep.
2010s 60.7 59.91 0.7883 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Georgia or Iran, Islamic Rep.?
Georgia, at 74.19 against 74.19 in Iran, Islamic Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Georgia and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Iran, Islamic Rep.?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Georgia and Iran, Islamic Rep. rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Georgia ranks 105th and Iran, Islamic Rep. ranks 105th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.