Dominican Republic vs Namibia: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Dominican Republic
58.58
in 2019
Namibia
60.9
in 2019
Dominican Republic rank
155th
Namibia rank
152nd

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Namibia
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 60.9 against 58.58 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 2.32.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 152nd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 57.87 55.18 2.69 Dominican Republic
2010s 58.18 59.2 1.02 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Dominican Republic or Namibia?
Namibia, at 60.9 against 58.58 in Dominican Republic as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Dominican Republic and Namibia?
2.32, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Namibia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Dominican Republic and Namibia rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Dominican Republic ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 152nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.