Dominica vs North Macedonia, Republic of: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Dominica
89.49
in 2019
North Macedonia, Republic of
89.18
in 2019
Dominica rank
29th
North Macedonia, Republic of rank
30th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Dominica
- North Macedonia, Republic of
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 89.49 against 89.18 in North Macedonia, Republic of, a difference of 0.31.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 29th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 30th of 190 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | North Macedonia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.71 | 80.49 | 6.21 | Dominica |
| 2010s | 89.49 | 89.18 | 0.3092 | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Dominica or North Macedonia, Republic of?
- Dominica, at 89.49 against 89.18 in North Macedonia, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Dominica and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 0.31, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and North Macedonia, Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Dominica and North Macedonia, Republic of rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Dominica ranks 29th and North Macedonia, Republic of ranks 30th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.