Democratic Republic of Congo vs Nigeria: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
54.1
in 2019
Nigeria
54.5
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
166th
Nigeria rank
165th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 54.5 against 54.1 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 166th and Nigeria ranks 165th of 191 countries.
Democratic Republic of Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.97 | 23.93 | 36.04 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 54.62 | 44.47 | 10.15 | Democratic Republic of Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 54.5 against 54.1 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria?
- 0.4, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Nigeria rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 166th and Nigeria ranks 165th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.