Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Central African Republic
32.92
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
31.53
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
177th
Equatorial Guinea rank
178th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 32.92 against 31.53 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.39.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th of 188 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.68 | 31.53 | 1.85 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 32.27 | 31.53 | 0.7419 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
- Central African Republic, at 32.92 against 31.53 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.39, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 177th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th of 188 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.