Canada vs Micronesia (country): Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Canada
87.33
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
87.79
in 2019
Canada rank
39th
Micronesia (country) rank
36th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Canada
  • Micronesia (country)
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Micronesia (country) currently reports 87.79 against 87.33 in Canada, a difference of 0.46.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 39th and Micronesia (country) ranks 36th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 1 and Micronesia (country) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 89.18 87.79 1.39 Canada
2010s 87.33 87.79 0.4637 Micronesia (country)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Canada or Micronesia (country)?
Micronesia (country), at 87.79 against 87.33 in Canada as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Canada and Micronesia (country)?
0.46, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Micronesia (country)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Canada and Micronesia (country) rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Canada ranks 39th and Micronesia (country) ranks 36th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.