Cameroon vs Equatorial Guinea: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Cameroon
11.13
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
31.53
in 2019
Cameroon rank
180th
Equatorial Guinea rank
178th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Cameroon
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 31.53 against 11.13 in Cameroon, a difference of 20.4.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 2.8 times Cameroon's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 180th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th of 188 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.49 | 31.53 | 25.04 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 7.42 | 31.53 | 24.11 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Cameroon or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 31.53 against 11.13 in Cameroon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea?
- 20.4, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Cameroon ranks 180th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 178th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.