Cameroon vs Central African Republic: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Cameroon
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 32.92 against 11.13 in Cameroon, a difference of 21.79.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 3.0 times Cameroon's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 180th and Central African Republic ranks 177th of 188 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.49 | 29.68 | 23.18 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 7.42 | 32.27 | 24.85 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Cameroon or Central African Republic?
- Central African Republic, at 32.92 against 11.13 in Cameroon as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Cameroon and Central African Republic?
- 21.79, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Central African Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Central African Republic rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Cameroon ranks 180th and Central African Republic ranks 177th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.