Cambodia vs Philippines: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Cambodia
80.83
in 2019
Philippines
81.14
in 2019
Cambodia rank
73rd
Philippines rank
72nd

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Cambodia
  • Philippines
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 81.14 against 80.83 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.31.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 73rd and Philippines ranks 72nd of 188 countries.

Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 86.77 77.43 9.34 Cambodia
2010s 80.83 78.52 2.31 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Cambodia or Philippines?
Philippines, at 81.14 against 80.83 in Cambodia as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Cambodia and Philippines?
0.31, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Philippines?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cambodia and Philippines rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Cambodia ranks 73rd and Philippines ranks 72nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.