Cape Verde vs United States: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Cape Verde
79.75
in 2019
United States
80.53
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
80th
United States rank
77th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • United States
020406080200520122019

How they compare

United States currently reports 80.53 against 79.75 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.78.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 80th and United States ranks 77th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde United States Difference Ahead
2000s 78.83 65.87 12.95 Cape Verde
2010s 79.29 80.15 0.8656 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Cape Verde or United States?
United States, at 80.53 against 79.75 in Cape Verde as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Cape Verde and United States?
0.78, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and United States?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and United States rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Cape Verde ranks 80th and United States ranks 77th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.