Bulgaria vs Central African Republic: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Bulgaria
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 39.41 against 32.92 in Central African Republic, a difference of 6.49.
That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.2 times Central African Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 178th and Central African Republic ranks 179th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 1 and Central African Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.15 | 29.68 | 14.53 | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 35.84 | 32.27 | 3.57 | Bulgaria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Bulgaria or Central African Republic?
- Bulgaria, at 39.41 against 32.92 in Central African Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Bulgaria and Central African Republic?
- 6.49, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Central African Republic?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bulgaria and Central African Republic rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Bulgaria ranks 178th and Central African Republic ranks 179th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.