Botswana vs Netherlands: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Botswana
89.03
in 2019
Netherlands
89.18
in 2019
Botswana rank
32nd
Netherlands rank
29th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • Netherlands
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 89.18 against 89.03 in Botswana, a difference of 0.15.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 32nd and Netherlands ranks 29th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 85.94 75.92 10.02 Botswana
2010s 85.56 88.79 3.23 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Botswana or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 89.18 against 89.03 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Botswana and Netherlands?
0.15, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Netherlands?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Botswana and Netherlands rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Botswana ranks 32nd and Netherlands ranks 29th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.