Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Senegal: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
44.05
in 2019
Senegal
43.28
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
175th
Senegal rank
176th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Senegal
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 44.05 against 43.28 in Senegal, a difference of 0.77.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 175th and Senegal ranks 176th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.17 | 1.85 | 45.32 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 43.76 | 20.7 | 23.06 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Senegal?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 44.05 against 43.28 in Senegal as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal?
- 0.77, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 175th and Senegal ranks 176th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.