Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Bangladesh
40.34
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
42.04
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
178th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
177th
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 42.04 against 40.34 in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.7.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 178th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 191 countries.
Sao Tome and Principe has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.26 | 42.04 | 8.78 | Sao Tome and Principe |
| 2010s | 41.55 | 42.04 | 0.4946 | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 42.04 against 40.34 in Bangladesh as of 2019.
- What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.7, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 178th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.