Australia vs United Kingdom: Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score

Australia
91.34
in 2019
United Kingdom
89.95
in 2019
Australia rank
24th
United Kingdom rank
27th

Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score over time

  • Australia
  • United Kingdom
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Australia currently reports 91.34 against 89.95 in United Kingdom, a difference of 1.39.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Australia ranks 24th and United Kingdom ranks 27th of 188 countries.

United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia United Kingdom Difference Ahead
2000s 91.04 91.96 0.9273 United Kingdom
2010s 91.16 91.21 0.0464 United Kingdom

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score, Australia or United Kingdom?
Australia, at 91.34 against 89.95 in United Kingdom as of 2019.
What is the difference in paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score between Australia and United Kingdom?
1.39, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and United Kingdom?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Australia and United Kingdom rank globally for paying taxes: time (hours per year) - score?
Australia ranks 24th and United Kingdom ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Paying taxes: Time (hours per year) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for time to comply with tax laws benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.